Saturday, February 08, 2025

 A Call to Action: Defending Democracy Against Authoritarian Overreach

The Trump administration’s relentless assault on American democracy has reached new heights with its recent efforts to use federal funding as a weapon against sanctuary jurisdictions. The administration—led by the new U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi—is threatening to freeze hundreds of millions of dollars in public safety grants and has filed lawsuits against states and cities that uphold sanctuary policies. These actions represent an existential threat to federalism, the rule of law, and the constitutional balance of power.

A Moment of Crisis: Watergate, 1933, and the 1850s

America has faced moments like this before. In the 1970s, President Nixon attempted to subvert democracy, but bipartisan forces, a free press, and the legal system held him accountable. In 1933, Adolf Hitler exploited a national crisis to seize unchecked power. In the 1850s, irreconcilable divisions over fundamental human rights drove the nation toward disunion and a costly civil war. Today, we are once again at a crossroads.

Donald Trump’s aggressive efforts to centralize executive authority and punish political opposition through federal coercion echo these dark chapters of history. If left unchecked, his administration’s defiance of legal norms and constitutional constraints could permanently alter the fabric of American governance.

A United Response: The Blue State Coalition

The time has come for the governors of America’s largest and most influential states—California, Illinois, New York, and Minnesota—to take decisive action. Governors Gavin Newsom, J.B. Pritzker, Kathy Hochul, and Tim Walz must lead a coordinated effort to force the Trump administration to follow the Constitution. Their demands should be clear and uncompromising:

  1. Rescind the DOJ’s Attacks on Sanctuary Cities. The federal government cannot compel state and local law enforcement to enforce immigration policy.
  2. Fire Elon Musk and Rescind DOGE. No private actor should wield unchecked influence over federal agencies and financial infrastructure.
  3. End the Purge of Career Officials. The removal of watchdogs, inspectors general, and nonpartisan public servants must stop immediately.
  4. Commit to the Rule of Law. Executive power must be bound by constitutional principles, not used as a tool of retribution.
  5. Ensure Bipartisan Governance. A ten-point plan must be drafted to ensure that governing decisions reflect the interests of all Americans, not just those who align with the administration’s political ideology.
  6. Reinstate the EPA Grants and Infrastructure Projects. Environmental and transportation funding must not be weaponized for political purposes.
  7. Uphold Birthright Citizenship. The Trump administration’s attempts to redefine the 14th Amendment must be stopped.
  8. Protect Free and Fair Elections. All states must work to safeguard voting rights and prevent federal interference in state-run elections.
  9. Reject the Politicization of Law Enforcement. The DOJ and ICE must not be used as instruments of political intimidation.
  10. Prepare for Escalation. If Trump refuses to comply, the blue states—representing nearly half the nation’s population and economy—must consider further steps, including legal action, economic measures, and other coordinated resistance.

A Clear Ultimatum: Follow the Constitution or Face Consequences

This is not simply a policy dispute. This is a battle for the soul of the nation. The blue states must make it clear that they will not allow authoritarianism to take hold. If Trump refuses to reverse course, they must escalate their response—using every legal, economic, and political tool at their disposal.

The very unity and existence of the Union as we know it is at stake. Either we uphold the Constitution and preserve democratic governance, or we allow unchecked power to erode the foundations of the Republic. The time to act is now.

Wednesday, February 05, 2025

Donald Trump Is a Walking Constitutional Crisis

When the MAGA faithful—driven by desperation, bigotry, and a repudiation of 75 years of progress—elected Donald Trump, they set in motion a cascade of events that threaten the very fabric of American democracy. As his second term unfolds, Trump’s actions have not only reaffirmed his reputation as a master of executive overreach, but they also bear the hallmarks of a constitutional crisis that could, if left unchecked, hasten the literal dissolution of the Union.

A Pattern of Authoritarian Overreach

From the outset, Trump’s presidency has been marked by a series of unilateral decisions that flagrantly disregard constitutional boundaries. In his latest term, the administration has moved to dismantle key federal institutions—such as USAID and the Department of Education—without congressional approval, under the misguided banner of “government efficiency.” Billionaire Elon Musk, now deeply enmeshed in Trump’s inner circle through his so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has been given unprecedented access to sensitive federal systems, from the Treasury’s payment networks to critical government databases. This power grab not only violates the separation of powers but also undermines the rule of law that has been the bedrock of American governance for centuries.

Legal Battles and Impeachable Offenses

Trump’s disregard for judicial mandates is evident in his refusal to lift the freeze on EPA grant funds—even after two federal court orders have compelled him to do so. By stalling the disbursement of billions of dollars earmarked for climate and infrastructure projects, the administration is not only obstructing justice but also endangering communities that rely on these funds. This, along with his repeated attacks on federal prosecutors, FBI agents, and the very integrity of the Justice Department itself, lays the groundwork for multiple articles of impeachment. Possible charges include abuse of power, violation of the separation of powers, obstruction of justice, and endangering public welfare and national security.

A Controversial Foreign Policy: The Gaza Proposal

Perhaps the most brazen of Trump’s recent proposals is his plan to “take over” Gaza and transform it into a “Riviera of the Middle East.” This outlandish idea—publicly declared by Trump and supported by some of his congressional allies—has drawn global condemnation. Critics, including international powers like Russia, China, and Germany, as well as key regional players like Saudi Arabia, have denounced the proposal as nothing short of ethnic cleansing. By advocating for the permanent displacement of millions of Palestinians, Trump is not only overturning decades of U.S. policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict but also risking another catastrophic humanitarian crisis reminiscent of the Nakba in 1948.

Domestic Hostility and Rising Extremism

The seeds of discontent sown during Trump’s election continue to bear bitter fruit. Videos circulating from Herriman, Utah, show members of the white nationalist group Patriot Front marching with signs reading “Deport Invaders.” Such imagery is a stark reminder that Trump’s tenure has emboldened extremist factions, fanning the flames of racial hostility and xenophobia. The attack on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across federal agencies—accompanied by the sidelining of federal employees in these offices—further underscores the administration’s commitment to dismantling decades of progress in social justice and equal opportunity.

Cracks in the Republican Wall

Even within his own party, Trump’s actions are sowing division. While some Republicans cheer his boldness, others, like Sen. Susan Collins and Sen. Rand Paul, have voiced concerns about his unchecked power and the potential legal consequences of his radical policies. The internal split over the Gaza proposal, where some leaders find it “problematic” while others dismiss it as a “couple of kinks in that Slinky,” reveals that even among his staunch supporters, there is growing apprehension about where this path might lead.

A Constitutional Crisis in the Making

The cumulative effect of these actions—a sweeping dismissal of judicial orders, blatant disregard for congressional authority over federal spending, and a foreign policy that flouts international law—paints a disturbing picture of a presidency that operates outside the bounds of the Constitution. If these trends continue unchecked, the nation could find itself embroiled in a constitutional showdown reminiscent of Watergate, but with even higher stakes. The erosion of democratic norms not only risks legal ruin for Trump but also threatens to fracture the political unity of the United States. The potential consequences extend far beyond political embarrassment; they could fundamentally weaken the institutions that have long safeguarded American democracy.

Conclusion

Donald Trump is not just a controversial figure—he is a walking constitutional crisis. His second term - not even three weeks old at this writing - is already marked by a relentless assault on the pillars of American governance: the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic accountability. From dismantling federal agencies and freezing crucial funding to proposing outrageous foreign policies and emboldening extremist groups, his actions have far-reaching implications. This was deliberately designed as a "shock and awe" measure to stifle dissent, but as legal battles intensify and bipartisan opposition mounts, there is a real risk that the nation could witness a cascade of events that ultimately lead to a profound political realignment—and perhaps even the dissolution of the Union as we know it.

It is imperative that Congress, the courts, and state governments act decisively to rein in this dangerous trajectory. History warns us that unchecked executive power, when combined with ideological extremism and a contempt for democratic norms, can lead to catastrophic outcomes. The time to stand up for constitutional governance is now.

Friday, October 04, 2024

Get Me Back to the Southwest (And Maybe Actually Get a Job)

UPDATE (July 2025): Thanks to some generous partners my one-way Amtrak ticket is now purchased and I will be leaving Sacramento for Albuquerque in early August. I am doing home exercises to strengthen my knee. The fundraiser is still active, so please consider helping me out so I can have a few extra dollars for food and snacks for the trip and to get off to a good start in New Mexico. Thanks again!

UPDATE: In November 2024 I sustained a knee injury and have spent the winter and spring getting treatment and waiting for various appointments related to that. As of spring 2025 I will be starting physical therapy in the hopes (according to the orthopedic surgeon) that I will not need surgery. We'll see what happens. This fundraiser is still active so please consider helping me out; even if I only raise enough for the one-way Amtrak fare which is about $120 or so. Thank you in advance.

Hello, hello,

After two years of living in Sacramento and participating in interviews with not one, not two, but seven different California state government agencies without securing a permanent position, I’ve come to a realization: California’s job market, especially for public service, is almost literally like trying to win a game where it’s IMPOSSIBLE to know the rules. In short, it’s tough, almost TOO tough—and I’ve decided it’s time to move on.

When I left Arizona in 2022, I didn’t want to leave, but I felt like, politically and career-wise, Arizona left me. I’m a native of Oakland, Northern California is home, and Sacramento is the state capital where the majority of state civil service jobs are. You’d think I’d get established right away, right? But as much as I’ve enjoyed my time here, and outside of the struggle to get established, I’ve realized the Southwest—where I spent something like 20 years of my life—has always felt more like home. I miss the desert, the mountains, and most importantly, a job market that isn’t so fiercely competitive it makes the Hunger Games look like a walk in the park.

So, I’m making another move, this time to Albuquerque, New Mexico. Why New Mexico, you ask? Well, it’s a state with great leadership, a reasonable cost of living, and a political atmosphere that’s actually, you know, moderate (with elements of progressive liberalism) and practical. Plus, it has a LOT of that awesome Southwestern diversity, attitude and culture that I'm used to, but it’s not Arizona (as much as I love that place, it’s time for something new). I’m feeling optimistic that this change will finally allow me to establish myself after giving California my best shot.


But here’s the thing: I need your help to make this happen. I’m trying to raise $2,500 to cover relocation costs—my fare on Amtrak, temporary housing (extended stay hotels, which are refreshingly affordable there), and basic living expenses while I get settled and start job hunting in Albuquerque. (I’ve actually already started sending out job applications and gotten some action, which is encouraging.)

If you’re feeling generous, you can donate directly to my Venmo: @MICHAEL-REED-668.

                                


Why Albuquerque?

Honestly? I’m over California’s crazy job market. After multiple interviews and countless applications, it’s clear that breaking into civil service here, and even the private sector, is next to impossible. But Albuquerque offers a fresh start—a place where I can rebuild, find work that fits my experience (customer service and clerical roles), and, hopefully, settle in a city where I can actually get hired. I've already got a phone screen scheduled for one potential job and might get another interview soon. And the desert and mountains (which in Albuquerque are just as nice as Phoenix and Tucson)? They’re a bonus.


What Your Donation Will Support:

  • Transportation: Getting me out of California and into Albuquerque via the Amtrak Southwest Chief.
  • Temporary Housing: Finding a roof over my head while I figure out where to stay permanently.
  • Basic Expenses: Covering food, transportation, and other essentials while I job hunt.

If you can chip in, even a little, it’ll go a long way toward helping me start fresh in a city where I stand a real chance. Your support would mean the world, and if you’re in Albuquerque, I’d love any tips or advice on navigating the local job market, especially for someone over 50.

Update: Those of you who are Amtrak Guest Rewards members: I also have a Guest Rewards account and if you have any extra points you'd like to share with me, drop me a line and let's make it happen. 

And THANK YOU in advance.

Donate via Venmo: @MICHAEL-REED-668



Thursday, September 26, 2024

 My Fine Art America page

For a couple of years now, I've had some of my artwork featured on Fine Art America. It's a marketplace where artists can share their creativity and hopefully profit a little from it. Check out some of my work!

https://fineartamerica.com/profiles/20-michael-reed







Sunday, December 24, 2023

Birthday reflections

It is the day before Christmas. Christmas Eve is my birthday. I have now reached my 54th year of life on this earth. Here is where I am at now, and how my 2023 has gone:

My journey in my new city of Sacramento, which began in the fall of 2022, continues.

I continue to stay in a homeless facility.

I have been homeless in five states, including California, at various periods in my life. The majority of homeless people I have seen have had some sort of issues with addiction, be it drug addiction, alcoholism, etc., but many times, poverty and the loss of a job has been to blame, and I am seeing more and more of the latter this time around. Nationwide, since the COVID pandemic, price gouging in rental properties has been a huge concern. California is an extremely expensive state in regards to cost of living.

According to HUD, the fair market rent for a studio apartment in Sacramento (the 2024 estimate) is $1543. Last year it was $1277. And Sacramento is among the less expensive places in California to live.
In comparison, according to HUD, the fair market rent for a studio apartment in Oakland is $1825. Last year it was $1658.
Fair market rent for a studio apartment in San Francisco is $2292. Last year it was $2156.

I challenge you to show me ANYONE making under $20 per hour who can afford even $1500 per month comfortably for an apartment.

But California is not alone. For comparison I’ll just post the numbers for Phoenix: Fair market rent, the estimate for 2024, for a studio apartment in Phoenix is $1460. Last year it was $1344. Compared to Oakland or San Francisco that’s low, but for Arizona, a state that traditionally has been one of the more affordable states, that’s dramatically higher than normal, and significantly higher than in 2020, when the FMR for a studio was $847.

The lack of affordability in rental housing is a big problem that’s contributing to the homeless crisis and the Federal government needs to take immediate action at the Federal level to bring these rental prices down.

I continue to look for employment, preferably with the state of California.

Obtaining a civil service job in California is frankly a nerve wracking and frustrating process. It is a difficult process that doesn’t need to be as difficult as it is. Fortune 100 corporations have significantly streamlined processes for applying to positions and those companies are able to attract highly competent and qualified people. And because of the aforementioned high cost of housing, it is simply not possible for me to consider any job that pays less than $20 per hour, so that I can have at least a fighting chance to afford to live in my own place here in Sacramento.

I continue to explore generative AI.

I served on a jury here in Sacramento for four days. The case was felony possession of drugs and a weapon with intent to sell. There were five counts. We found “not guilty” in one count and deadlocked on the rest; the judge declared a mistrial. The defendant was visibly relieved to the point of tears. The courthouse in Sacramento dates from the 1960s and is on its last legs. Its replacement is a state-of-the-art 20 story building a few blocks closer to the river which is about 90 percent complete. Jury duty is crazy. This is only the second time I have ever had to serve on a jury, the last was back in Phoenix several years ago on a DUI case (we found that guy guilty).

Outside of all of this, there is nothing new to report. I am waiting for word on whether I got one particular job or not with the state of California; that position begins in early February.

Tuesday, November 21, 2023

The holiday season is starting!

As the holiday season is getting underway, I wanted to give you a quick update on my journey here in Sacramento. Since my move in September 2022, I've been on the hunt for work, participating in several interviews along the way. It's been a bit of a rollercoaster. I have been on several interviews this year, but no deal has yet been sealed. After months of looking for a civil service job in California state government, I did find an agency interested enough in me to extend a conditional job offer back in June, only to rescind it because my previous companies don't give detailed manager references - only basic employment verification information. That was absolutely unfair. I have since filed a formal complaint and appeal with the State Personnel Board, and they have opened an investigation.

Currently, I'm still in temporary accommodations, and any support you can offer means the world to me. The best way that you can help is by checking out my stuff on Fine Art America. I've been showcasing my art there for a while now, from wall pieces to apparel and home decor. https://fineartamerica.com/profiles/20-michael-reed

Speaking of creativity, I've been playing around with generative AI this year to great effect. I recently used ChatGPT to craft a fictional story called "The Beistfamilien." It's all about this tribe, a fusion of ancient beasts and early humans, navigating their unique existence through time. If you're into mystical tales, this might be right up your alley.
https://books2read.com/b/bpNodX

And if you're able to lend a hand quickly, a couple of bucks in my online tip jar (via PayPal) would be amazing.
https://paypal.me/SactoMSR22?country.x=US&locale.x=en_US

I'm also following my two football teams of choice, the Arizona Wildcats and the UC Davis Aggies. Both teams are doing GREAT and should make it to postseason play! #BearDown

Wishing you a fantastic Thanksgiving and hope that it's an awesome kickoff to the holiday season. Thanks for being a part of my journey.

More to come, so stay tuned!

Friday, November 17, 2023

Using AI to stay engaged and maintain creativity

For the last few months, I have been learning how to effectively utilize ChatGPT. I engaged ChatGPT in a scenario set on a fictional Caribbean island called Covertia, where I explored the world of a fictionalized version of the renowned old-school conglomerate, Westinghouse.

With ChatGPT's assistance, I was able to outline a complete scenario that covered every aspect of the relocation process, from the initial inquiry to taking a trip on a container ship to this island, to securing a position as a graphic designer in Westinghouse's (fictional) regional office. It provided me with valuable insights into the interview process and my first assignments within the company.


A view of my fictional Westinghouse workplace in the Caribbean (the building in the center of the image). Illustration created with Ideogram AI, a generative AI image creation tool. https://ideogram.ai/


Given my real-world experience in telephone call centers, I decided to delve deeper into this field by creating hypothetical narratives involving my cross-training in the customer service call center at the fictional regional headquarters. ChatGPT helped me explore various aspects, including call flow, training programs, marketing initiatives, Six Sigma integration and even hypothetical customer interactions. It was interesting to see ChatGPT’s rather comprehensive take on the customer service and call center space.

Another fascinating aspect was the opportunity to collaborate with ChatGPT in writing a script for a thirty-second commercial promoting Westinghouse's factory authorized repair service. The creativity and versatility of ChatGPT truly amazed me as it effortlessly generated a compelling script that captured the essence of the service.

The responses I have received throughout this journey have been nothing short of amazing. ChatGPT is not a perfect tool, but if you give it the right prompts, try again when you get a response that’s not quite what you want, and ask ChatGPT to role play as a writer or editor, you might be pleasantly surprised at the results.

I am also using ChatGPT to help me write answers to sample interview questions and formulate the copy for cover letters and the like.

I'm also using AI art creation tools like NightCafe, DALL-E and Ideogram.ai to create visually interesting and stunning imagery. These image creation tools do not quite hit "reality" 100 percent but they make for interesting illustrations. I will be posting some soon.


Sunday, November 12, 2023

Tackling California's homeless crisis: Make Inside Safe a statewide program

In the face of an escalating homelessness crisis, California finds itself at a pivotal moment. California's cities and counties are bearing the brunt of the impact, and of the response. The urgency of the situation demands a bold response, prompting the call for greater action on the part of state government, starting with a statewide emergency declaration. This move should come as part of a comprehensive strategy that includes taking the successful Inside Safe program statewide and leveraging the California Health and Human Services Agency (CalHHS) to channel crucial block grants directly to counties.

California's Homelessness Emergency: A Critical Imperative

California's homelessness crisis has reached unprecedented levels, requiring immediate and decisive action. The depth and complexity of the issue necessitate a statewide emergency declaration, acknowledging the gravity of the situation and mobilizing resources at every level of government.

Inside Safe: From Local Success to Statewide Solution

In 2023, Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles declared a state of emergency in response to the escalating homelessness crisis. This marked the initiation of the Inside Safe program, a proactive, housing-led strategy designed to transition individuals from tents and encampments to stable housing. The success of this initiative on the local level has spurred a visionary idea that merits serious consideration – to take Inside Safe statewide.

Under the leadership of Governor Gavin Newsom, California needs desperately to replicate the success of Inside Safe in cities and counties across the state. Such a move would signify a paradigm shift in addressing homelessness, replacing short-term fixes with sustainable solutions that prioritize housing and support services.

CalHHS: Channeling Resources for Statewide Impact

To fortify this initiative, CalHHS should play a pivotal role in channeling block grants to counties. This strategic approach would ensure that resources are directed efficiently, addressing the unique needs of each locality while adhering to overarching statewide goals. Funding under the existing and successful Project Homekey would be fully incorporated into this expanded initiative.

CalHHS should provide clear and comprehensive guidelines to counties, outlining the intended use of Inside Safe block grants. This meticulous oversight would foster accountability and transparency in fund utilization, creating a framework that ensures funds are directed toward initiatives aligned with the core objectives of Inside Safe.

County-Specific Plans: Tailoring Solutions for Local Impact

Recognizing the diversity of challenges faced by each county, a statewide Inside Safe program would encourage counties and municipalities to develop detailed plans outlining the utilization of allocated funds. These plans should align with the overarching goals of the initiative while addressing the unique needs and challenges specific to each locality.

Flexibility is key. Counties would be encouraged to adapt their plans to cater to the specific needs of their communities, fostering a localized approach to combat homelessness effectively. CalHHS would offer continuous technical assistance, guiding counties in aligning their initiatives with the program's goals, ensuring a tailored and impactful response.

Oversight and Reporting: Ensuring Accountability at Every Step

To guarantee the success and accountability of the Inside Safe program, CalHHS should conduct regular audits and evaluations. These measures would monitor the progress of county initiatives, ensuring compliance with established guidelines and fostering consistency in implementation.

Counties, in turn, would submit periodic progress reports to CalHHS, detailing their initiatives, expenditures, outcomes achieved, and challenges faced. This transparent reporting mechanism would ensure that the State remains informed about the impact of county initiatives, allowing for targeted support where needed.

In conclusion, California's proactive approach to combat homelessness through a statewide emergency declaration and the expansion of the Inside Safe program would showcase a commitment to tangible, sustainable change. By leveraging the expertise of CalHHS and empowering local communities, California can truly make significant strides toward addressing the homelessness crisis and providing every resident with a chance to rebuild their lives.

Friday, November 10, 2023

A win win scenario and solution to the Oakland Athletics dilemma

In a fictional world where the baseball gods convened, here's a hypothetical solution to the Oakland Athletics' quandary – a compromise that aims to bridge the gap between loyalty and expansion:

1. **Apology and Summit:** Picture a summit meeting between MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred and Oakland Mayor Sheng Thao. In this alternate reality, Manfred extends a heartfelt apology for his past remarks about Oakland not being a baseball-friendly market.

2. **Compromise Unveiled:** A groundbreaking compromise surfaces – John Fisher, the A's owner, is granted permission to relocate the team to Las Vegas. However, the soul of the franchise, its intellectual property – name, logo, colors, history, and records – stays rooted in Oakland. Much like the NFL's precedent with the Cleveland Browns, this move ensures that the essence of the A's remains in the city.

3. **Rise of the Nevada Silver Sox:** The relocated team under Fisher's ownership gets a fresh start as the Nevada Silver Sox, embracing a new identity while honoring the legacy left in Oakland.

4. **The Rebirth at the Coliseum:** A new Oakland Athletics ballpark takes shape at the Coliseum grounds after the original structure is gracefully retired. Adding a touch of local flavor, the naming rights are secured by Clorox, anchoring the team to its roots.

5. **New Ownership Duo:** Enter a bid from Joe Lacob and Vivek Ranadive, swiftly approved, as they step in to become the new owners of the Athletics. A fresh perspective and commitment to the community breathe new life into the team.

6. **Transitional Home:** To accommodate the transition, a temporary stadium springs up for the 2024 season. For the first half, most games find a home at Hohokam in Mesa, creating an anticipation that echoes the resilience and adaptability of the A's spirit.

In this alternate reality, the proposed compromise seeks to accomplish two essential goals – retaining the A's presence in Oakland and Northern California while granting the John Fisher franchise the opportunity to flourish in the eager and deserving Las Vegas market. While purely speculative, such a scenario offers a glimpse into a win-win outcome for fans on both sides of the debate.

How I got here: From Mesa to Tucson to Sacramento

In September 2022, the chapters of my life shifted from Mesa to Sacramento (by way of Tucson) revealing a narrative shaped by challenges and unexpected turns:

1. **Farewell to Mesa:** The journey commenced with the loss of my Mesa apartment in April of 2022, prompting a venture into the familiar embrace of Tucson. However, the allure faded as the search for a job that could match the sharply increased rents became an elusive pursuit. Tucson used to be cheap, not any more.

2. **Economic Crossroads in Tucson:** Tucson, a city laden with personal history, unfolded as an economic crossroads. Despite its significance as a University of Arizona grad and the backdrop of past relationships, the reality of securing employment in tandem with rising living costs became a defining factor.

3. **Political Unease in Arizona:** Beyond economic concerns, political uncertainty in Arizona cast a shadow over my decision-making. The looming presence of a serious Donald Trump supporter (former TV newswoman Kari Lake) as a gubernatorial candidate, coupled with a strong contingent of Trump supporters in the state legislature, added layers of unease.

4. **Sacramento Calling:** Amidst uncertainties, Sacramento emerged as a beacon of stability. Positioned as the seat of the state government and in close proximity to my hometown of Oakland, it seemed the logical choice for a fresh start.

5. **Unforeseen Employment Challenges:** However, relocating to Sacramento brought unexpected hurdles. The assumption of ample opportunities within the state government collided with the reality of difficulty and challenges in securing meaningful employment.

Stay tuned for a deeper dive into the intricacies of my Sacramento journey. The tale unfolds, capturing the essence of resilience and adaptation in the face of change. 🌐 #MesaToSacramento #LifeInTransition

Here's what you can expect as 2023 winds down

After a hiatus, I'm resuming my narrative, offering a glimpse into the upcoming chapters that will unfold in this digital space. Here's a preview of what's on the horizon:

1. **Sacramento Chronicles:** Embark on an unfiltered exploration of my Sacramento journey. From grappling with homelessness to navigating the intricate landscape of job searches, I'll be candidly sharing the challenges and triumphs.

2. **Urban Showdown - Sacramento vs. Tucson vs. Phoenix:** Join me in a comparative analysis of Sacramento against the backdrop of Tucson and Phoenix. Each city possesses its distinctive allure, and I'll be dissecting these nuances.

3. **Return to Arizona?:** In a reflective piece, I'll delve into the possibility of returning to Arizona under specific conditions. It's a contemplative examination of the factors that could potentially draw me back to the arid landscapes.

4. **AI Chronicles of 2023:** Explore the integral role of Artificial Intelligence in my 2023 narrative. From streamlining tasks to elevating experiences, AI has silently shaped my journey. I'll be shedding light on its subtle yet significant impact.

Anticipate an engaging ride ahead—this is merely a glimpse into what's to come. Fasten your seatbelts, stay engaged, and let's venture into these unfolding narratives together. Your steadfast support is cherished, and I eagerly anticipate connecting with you through the upcoming posts. 🚀 #BloggerChronicles #NewBeginnings

Dusting this thing off (again)

I haven't posted on here in quite a while. In the interim I changed states (leaving Arizona for my home state of California, specifically Sacramento) and on a new unemployment journey. I have also embraced using AI tools like ChatGPT, Dall-E, NightCafe and Ideogram.

More to come.

Sunday, January 24, 2021

My thoughts on the 2020 election - and the state of our nation

The blue wave everyone was hoping for in Election 2020? Well, it hit a red wall.

American democracy hit the guardrails, and precariously careened back and forth across a slippery slope.

And almost plunged down the embankment of insurrection and domestic terror.

These are my thoughts on the election, the state of our union, and our future.


In the weeks leading up to Election Day, I was becoming cautiously optimistic that Joe Biden would easily secure 400 electoral votes.

That optimistic attitude came to a screeching halt on Election Night.

While I was happy that there were a lot of states that went blue, I was disappointed that Texas and Florida stayed red.

The days immediately after Election Day were agonizing, waiting for the votes to be counted in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Nevada, and here in Arizona.

At the Maricopa County election headquarters in downtown Phoenix, Trump supporters gathered, some of them carrying signs that said “Hang on patriots, hold the line, God wins.” Elections staffers had to be escorted to their cars after their shifts were over to be protected from the crowds.

In the downtown areas of San Francisco and other cities, stores and office skyscrapers barricaded their plate glass windows with panel after panel of plywood, bracing not for a Category 5 hurricane, but for any eruptions of civil unrest that might possibly flare up as the results came in.

In Pennsylvania, a group of people were arrested, having driven from Virginia with an SUV full of weapons and ammunition. It is unclear whether the downtown Philadelphia convention center, where thousands of votes were being counted, was a target.

On Saturday, November 7, five days after Election Day, the Associated Press, NBC News, CBS News and other news outlets called Pennsylvania for Joe Biden, presumably giving him enough electoral votes to claim victory.

Celebrations literally erupted in the streets of New York City, and in Austin, Texas.

As the weeks went by and votes were counted, recounted and certified, the Trump administration stubbornly held its ground and refused to concede to Biden. Trump repeatedly stated publicly that votes were counted illegally, and many of his followers believed him, coining the chant, “stop the steal.” Trump and numerous Republicans nationwide launched several attempts to subvert the election and overturn the results, alleging widespread voter fraud and trying to influence the vote counting process in swing states. The state of Georgia was a particularly strong target as they took an exceptionally long time to finish counting, and then recounting - twice - the presidential vote. The Associated Press did not officially call Georgia for Biden until November 13, two weeks after Election Day. 

Trump actually telephoned Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on January 2 and personally pressured him to change the state's vote totals and “find 11,780 votes” to put him over the top and turn the election in has favor, remaining in power. Raffensperger released the tape of the call to the news media the next day. This phone call was cited in the second impeachment trial held against him, and on January 13, 2021, Donald Trump became the first president in our history to be officially impeached twice by the House of Representatives.

The Trump legal team, led by former New York mayor, “America’s Mayor,” Rudy Giuliani, whose reputation (after largely being regarded during most of his mayoral tenure as being absolutely hostile to the interests and needs Black and Brown communities and to the poor and working class of his city, with major officer-involved deaths occurring on his watch) catapulted as it was into iconic status after the events of 9/11, took a major plummet as he eventually became known as a major Trump supporter, promoter, loyalist and defender, filed several dozen legal complaints, making accusations of fraud. But when the lawyers had to admit, in court, that their arguments had no merit, and that there was no evidence of voter fraud at all, case after case - over 60 of them - was either dismissed (some of the judges involved were actually appointed by Trump) or withdrawn altogether.

The Trump appointed administrator of the General Services Administration, Emily Murphy, acting in accord with Trump’s refusal to concede and to take legal action, refused to provide millions of dollars in Federal funds to the Biden transition team to access government offices and resources to begin planning for a peaceful transition of power. Only when Democratic members of Congress threatened a subpoena to have her testify under oath as to why she was breaking with precedent, and possibly Federal law, did she, two weeks later, release the funds and allow the process to start, being careful to also state in her official letter that she and her family were the subject of death threats for her refusal to act.

Analysts and experts went on news programs proclaiming that American democracy passed a major stress test with Donald Trump, culminating in his refusal to concede and allow a smooth and peaceful transition of power. They said that the “guardrails” of our democracy kept our nation from quite literally falling off a cliff.

But how long could this tenuous truce last? Joe Biden, as of Thanksgiving 2020, in addition to a final electoral vote count of 306 (the same as Donald Trump’s EV count in 2016) received a popular vote of 80 million, the highest popular vote total for any candidate in the history of this republic. 

Donald Trump, meanwhile, received 74 million votes, far surpassing his vote total of 2016. That means 74 million people liked Donald Trump - and everything he and his Republican Party stated for - enough to call our national unity into continuing question.


How long could this tenuous truce last? 

We got our answer, and the answer was rooted in the ongoing Cold Civil War we are mired in.

In late October, as the campaign was beginning to draw to its dramatic close, several vehicles flying Trump flags tried to force a Biden-Harris campaign bus off a highway in Texas, forcing a Democratic campaign event to be canceled and the FBI to launch an investigation. 

On October 8, the FBI announced the arrests of 13 men suspected of planning to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer, the governor of Michigan, and violently overthrow the Michigan government. There were violent clashes at the state capitals in Wisconsin and Oregon.

All of this culminated in the so-called “revolution”, the domestic terrorist insurrection, the attack on the United States Capitol Building in Washington on January 6, where thousands of pro-Trump supporters, several outfitted in paramilitary gear, encouraged to storm the Capitol by Trump himself just moments before (speaking in person at a “Stop the Steal” and “Save America” rally on the Capitol lawn, declaring he would "never concede" the election), breached and overran woefully inadequate barriers and completely overwhelmed a curiously and shockingly understaffed “skeleton crew” force of Capitol Police, physically attacking officers, returning sprays of pepper spray with their own bear spray, actually scaling the walls of the building, smashing windows and ramming open doors to force their way inside, literally breaking into the offices of lawmakers and defiantly occupying them (a laptop computer was allegedly stolen from the office of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi - where an Arkansas man was photographed sitting in her chair with his feet nonchalantly propped on her desk), and forcing Congress to go into immediate recess with lawmakers hastily evacuated (the joint session of Congress was just beginning the Electoral College vote count to formalize Biden's victory - normally an unremarkable formality) and a few of them literally fearing for their lives. Five people (including a member of the Capitol Police) died and at least several thousands of dollars in damage was done, including damage to some valuable works of art in the building. The rioters also apparently destroyed a display honoring the life of African American congressman and civil rights leader John Lewis.

An actual gallows, with a rope and a noose, was erected outside the Capitol building, presumably to “hang Mike Pence,” referring to the Vice-President.

In my estimation, this insurrection was as shocking as it was inevitable, certainly because of the defiance of Trump and his efforts to overturn the election and remain in power, but also because of what this represents, and I believe the seeds of this were sown as early as 2008, when Barack Obama, the first man of African descent, the first man to identify as an African American, was elected to the highest office in our nation and proclaimed the leader of the free world. This was too much for that percentage of White Americans who feel that America is somehow their exclusive nation and that the accomplishments and achievements of racial and ethnic minorities somehow mean that they lose some of their power and “White privilege.” To them, any win for a minority is an unacceptable loss for them - a “zero sum game.” 

This idea has played out in the succeeding years in an increased amount of hate crimes against minorities, and instances of police brutality and several heavily publicized officer-involved deaths of African Americans, giving rise to the Black Lives Matter movement, the resurgence of the “antifa” movement and the concurrent rise of white nationalist backlash movements led by groups like the Proud Boys and the Oathkeepers. Reports of white nationalist ideas and attitudes infiltrating law enforcement and military also became a troubling concern.

That is what all this was about. I’m frankly surprised the January 6th insurrection didn’t occur in 2008 after Obama’s election. This is all an attempt to preserve white supremacy in America and keep this nation from becoming the true multiracial and multiethnic democracy it should be, and that the natural forces of progress are leading it towards. Arguably, the election of Trump in 2016 was such an attempt, an attempt to “make America great again,” translated as making America a nation where White people could have total and complete control and power again - especially over the very lives of those ethnic and racial minorities that they despise and regard as enemies to be somehow defeated - in order for them to survive.

Such attitudes are frankly disturbing, troubling, sad, and unacceptable.

For Trump’s part, the day after the insurrection, he gave a televised speech calling for calm, for tensions to be reduced and condemning the actions (essentially throwing his “patriots” under the bus after publicly praising them in the immediate hours afterward) and without mentioning Joe Biden by name, said that “a new administration will be inaugurated on January 20” and that his focus will be on “ensuring a smooth, orderly and seamless transition of power.” This came after several high-level administration officials, including Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao and former White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney (serving by this time as special envoy to Northern Ireland) resigned in protest of the insurrection.

A single article of impeachment charging Trump with "incitement of insurrection" against the U.S. government and "lawless action at the Capitol" was introduced to the House of Representatives on January 11 and on January 13, he was the first president in U.S. history to be impeached twice. Of course, he was previously impeached in December 2019 for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. (The trial in the Senate is scheduled to start on February 9, while this comes too late to remove Trump from power, it could permanently disqualify Trump from ever holding public office again in the United States.)

And on January 20, Joe Biden was inaugurated as the 46th president of the United States - after as many as 25,000 National Guard troops were deployed to protect the Capitol, three times the number activated for recent inaugurations.


What did we learn from this crazy election of 2020???

If this nation doesn’t get its act together RIGHT NOW and start GETTING ALONG, start treating ourselves with mutual friendship and respect, as members of an American FAMILY rather than enemies, regardless of race, religion, sex, political party, favorite brand of soda, etc., we are DONE as a nation. Period. We won’t HAVE a nation to argue over because the split will be complete, which is what our foreign adversaries WANT. They WANT us angry and fighting each other!

That means Republicans and Democrats in Congress as well as the executive branch and the courts/SCOTUS need to do THEIR part in making sure “tensions” are “dialed down.” That means as a society we STOP trying to turn the clock back to 1956 and we allow for some “socialism” if that’s what most Americans want and where progress is taking society.

That means White people (at least a percentage of them) actually start believing that “Black Lives Matter” and allow racial minorities to have some of their “privilege” without getting pissed off and becoming neo-nazis and carrying tiki torches and AR-15s because a woman or a Black person or an immigrant is getting ahead in life. Or because someone says “wear a mask” in the middle of a pandemic where people are still getting sick and dying and doctors and nurses are getting burned out.

That means people in America’s heartland and rural areas find ways to be relevant and competitive in the 21st century, and people in our major cities pay attention to the heartland, from where we get our food and a lot of our energy.

ALL SIDES are mutually angry at one another and our nation is being torn apart, because we disagree on what kind of nation we will be and to whom it rightfully belongs.

History is filled with the bullet holes, mass graves and “peace monuments” of nations that failed to learn this lesson.

I strongly believe there is a segment of America not so much afraid of Biden becoming president, or even of Obama becoming president in 2008 and serving two relatively successful terms in office - but of what all of that represents to them.

America is changing. America is becoming more Black. It is becoming more brown. More female. More Muslim. More gay. More lesbian. More atheist. More “millennial.” More technological. More sophisticated. More urban. More Brooklyn. More Atlanta. More Hollywood. More Oakland. More Portland. More Seattle. More Chicago. More DC. More San Antonio. More Tucson. More Houston. More Miami.

Earlier in this election journey, I actually wanted Kamala Harris to be the nominee. I wanted America to embrace a female president who identifies as a Black woman of partial South Asian descent. I wanted that acknowledgement, but was once again disappointed when Harris had to end her campaign after not catching on. At least now, she is our Vice President.

The changes happening in American society, the emergence, the perseverance, the resiliency and the ongoing small victories of Black and brown people, are changes that are ongoing, and unavoidable. They are also unacceptable to a certain percentage of the population that wants the nation “the way it was” when minorities were by and large denied the rights and privileges they assume are theirs and theirs alone.

This is why, also in this crazy election year, when they had a chance to embrace change, Mississippi refused to elect Mike Espy, one of the nation’s most competent and experienced African American government officials, and kept Cindy Hyde-Smith. This is why Kentucky refused Amy McGrath and kept Mitch McConnell. This is why North Carolina is keeping Thom Tillis. This is why Texas is keeping John Cornyn.

This is why Amy Coney Barrett was hastily rushed onto the bench as a justice of the Supreme Court.

America has been a nation ruled under the spoken, and unspoken, conventions of white supremacy for all of its history. That has been challenged every generation of this nation’s history, and people have died because of those challenges. Our nation has had many race riots and massacres over the years, and change makers such as Martin Luther King, Jr. and some of the early Black Panther members were assassinated, because Blacks and other minorities dared to say “I AM A MAN” and “Black Lives Matter” in the face of those who said “no you are not and no they don’t.”

The events of Wednesday, January 6th - the Capitol Hill "revolution”, the breach of the United States Capitol, could have been ten times more powerful and meaningful if it was 1) nonviolent 2) multiracial 3) a true call for economic justice for Main Street and the 99 percent. 

But no, Black Lives Matter and Antifa are the "enemy".

LBJ once said, "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

This is still true today, and how sad.

Working people and middle-class people of ALL races and ethnic backgrounds should be the BEST friends and the STRONGEST allies for justice and equality. But far too often, Americans allow themselves to be brainwashed into racism, bigotry, fear and conspiracy theories.

This fear translates DIRECTLY into who we vote for and what political parties and policies we support.

There are reasons most Black people vote for Democrats and the White vote is mostly Republican depending upon which region in the country you look. 

And this fear - fear of Black people, Hispanic people, whatever, “taking over” America and making our nation “socialist” - led DIRECTLY to that disgraceful, unacceptable, infuriating and tragic scene on Capitol Hill

And as I mentioned, it was that scene that temporarily interrupted the certification process of the electoral college votes for the Biden/Harris ticket - an event that normally barely merits a two-minute mention on the evening news, but itself was a subject of controversy since at least a few Congressmen and Senators, led by the likes of Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz made motions to challenge the electoral votes and call for some sort of audit. This after over 60 court challenges by the Trump legal team to the vote in states such as Georgia, Nevada and Pennsylvania were almost immediately rejected by Federal judges, some of whom, as I mentioned above, were appointed by Trump himself.

That attitude has NOT gone away.

Either Americans finally learn the hard lesson of acceptance and equality for ALL of its people, or we may very well NOT have an America for fight over any longer.

I have said previously on Quora that America may very well break up into separate mini-nations within 25–50 years if the different “sides” find each other’s positions so unacceptable that compromise is no longer possible, and actual armed conflict between each side becomes a clear and present danger.

Every time I am hopeful we have avoided that cliff, something happens to disappoint me. Something like the recent election results, and the run-up to them.

Some people say “Democrats just want to scare you while maintaining control of you. How many people have they helped?” I counter that argument with the realization that Republicans also want to scare Americans - into seeing one another as enemies instead of fellow citizens and family, and that their unique brand of “maintaining control” is best for keeping “socialism” out of government and letting the “free market” decide everything from who gets to see a doctor to who gets hired for jobs, and if it’s cheaper to build that automobile plant in this country or not. It’s Republicans and the conservative movement that want to “conserve” the way things were in a bygone era that cannot return, just on account of simple demographic changes that cannot be avoided. 

Yes, people of all races and ethnicities do want to live the best possible life in a country that rightfully belongs to everyone. I suspect that some shred of common ground can be found on that fact. It is my hope that reasonable Americans can find that common ground again, not let the politics of fear or control make us hate and despise one another, and that we take a look at history and recognize - and work to correct - the historical wrongs that were done in the name of officially disrespecting and hating those of a different color of skin.

I am drawn to the poem recited at the inauguration by Amanda Gorman, the National Youth Poet Laureate of the United States. The poem ends with these lines: 

When day comes, we step out of the shade aflame and unafraid. The new dawn blooms as we free it. For there is always light. If only we’re brave enough to see it. If only we’re brave enough to be it.

Are we really brave enough, as Americans in this multiracial democracy, to be the light of a new dawn?

America rightfully belongs to ALL of us. Regardless of race, color, gender or any other difference we have no control over. The sooner we swallow our pride and, at long last, learn that critical lesson, the sooner we can move forward together as ONE American nation and work together to solve the issues we face and confidently build a future in which we can credibly be looked upon by the rest of the world as a TRULY “great” nation.


Saturday, July 20, 2019

What have we really learned in 50 years?

As I write this, America is celebrating the 50th anniversary of the landing of the Apollo 11 spacecraft on the surface of the moon.

Astronaut Buzz Aldrin in spacesuit walking on lunar surface
Buzz Aldrin on the moon.
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/40th/images/apollo_image_12.html

At that moment, when the late Neil Armstrong uttered those words (which everyone has memorized by now), “one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind,” the nation and the world were actually in a relative state of chaos and unrest.

Four months earlier, the “Chicago Seven” were indicted by a Federal grand jury (under the “law and order” Nixon Justice Department headed by Attorney General John Mitchell, who would himself, ironically, serve 19 months of prison time years later for helping out (in the form of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and perjury) in the Watergate affair) for their protest actions during the chaotic and divisive 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago, and Bobby Seale, a member of the Black Panther Party (BPP), for a time originally made them the Chicago Eight. (By 1973 most of the charges were reversed and little jail time was actually served, except for Seale, who was sentenced to four years in prison on contempt charges (he was only in Chicago for two days), dropped from the case altogether and placed on trial in 1970 for an unrelated murder of a BPP member in New Haven, CT for which the charges were eventually dropped.)

Oakland Museum of California

And this is not counting the ongoing war in Vietnam which was continuing to claim the lives of MANY American servicemen, and giving more fuel to student protests across the nation.

In the spring of 1969, California’s Republican governor and future U.S. president Ronald Reagan ordered a state of emergency and 2,700 National Guard troops to the streets of Berkeley to suppress the protests at People’s Park, near the University of California flagship campus. This was AFTER hundreds of Berkeley police, California Highway Patrol officers and Alameda County sheriff’s deputies, in full riot gear, assembled and used tear gas and buckshot to try and “control” the crowd (one student was killed by police gunfire, another permanently made blind, and hundreds more were sent to local hospitals with injuries).



Highway patrolmen and National Guard soldiers blocking demonstrators in Berkeley, California. May 20, 1969. Robert Stinnett, photographer. Gelatin silver print. Collection of the Oakland Museum of California. The Oakland Tribune Collection. Gift of ANG Newspapers.
http://picturethis.museumca.org/pictures/highway-patrolmen-and-national-guard-soldiers-blocking-demonstrators-berkeley-california


Student protest, University of California, Berkeley, National Guard. May 22, 1969. Lonnie Wilson, photographer. Gelatin silver print. Collection of Oakland Museum of California. The Oakland Tribune Collection. Gift of Alameda Newspaper Group.http://picturethis.museumca.org/pictures/student-protest-university-california-berkeley-national-guard

The whole point of these protests was not directly related to the Vietnam War, like so many other protests around the nation, but rather a local conflict between students and the University administration, who owned the land and wanted to build dorms and offices on the 3-acre site, three blocks south of campus. The students wanted a place to hold free speech rallies and basically have fun, so (acting upon a proposal by two students presented in a meeting of local merchants to discuss the site) they took matters into their own hands (anticipating the Occupy movement by a few decades) and quite literally, with the help of a landscape architect, brought tons of plants, flowers, trees and sod and turned the vacant land into what was essentially public open space, without official permission or sanction from the University administration.

Everyone seemed quite happy with this perfectly fine use of the space. But not Ronald Reagan and not the UC administration. Now, the chancellor of the campus did try to work with the students; he negotiated with the Environmental Design department and other student groups to come up with a workable plan for the site, and promised no action at least until such a plan was looked at.

But when the school took the land back over in a surprise move, in the wee hours of a morning, without any notice, and fenced it off to start construction on some athletic fields, that’s when the protests began.

“On Thursday, May 15, 1969 at 4:30 a.m., Governor Reagan sent California Highway Patrol and Berkeley police officers into People's Park, overriding (University) Chancellor (Roger) Heyns' May 6 promise that nothing would be done without warning. The officers cleared an 8-block area around the park while a large section of what had been planted was destroyed and an 8-foot (2.4 m)-tall perimeter chain-link wire fence was installed to keep people out and to prevent the planting of more trees, grass, flowers, or shrubs.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Park_(Berkeley)

Later that day, about 3,000 students gathered in front of Sproul Hall, the campus administration building, to rally and discuss the Arab-Israeli situation. The conversation turned to the park. Many students already knew about the park being fenced off, and they were not happy. The increasingly angry crowd proceeded briskly down Telegraph Avenue, the main commercial drag just south of campus, to the park, chanting and shouting

“We want the park! We want the park!”

where they were met by the police, the barricades and the tear gas. I watched old news footage of all this on YouTube. It frankly looked like the “yellow vest” protests in Paris of just a few months ago. Students throwing rocks at CHP officers and those officers throwing (and shooting) tear gas right back at them. Frightened business owners along Telegraph hurriedly trying to close up shop. Injured students being dragged along the asphalt roadway to safety. Police cars being overturned by students. Students being beaten with nightsticks. May 15, 1969 is forever known as "Bloody Thursday."

(A family friend of ours was personally in the area at the time in her 1965 Impala and could not get out of the neighborhood for several hours, as she told us one day in the 1980s; she could smell the tear gas wafting into her car.) It was aid about some of the cops, many of whom had recently been deployed to Vietnam,

(Alameda County) Sheriff (Frank) Madigan did admit, however, that some of his deputies (many of whom were Vietnam War veterans) had been overly aggressive in their pursuit of the protesters, acting "as though they were Viet Cong."

Reagan ordered National Guard helicopters to even disperse tear gas from overhead, but it wafted into neighborhoods miles away, making elementary school kids sick.



Helicopter sprays tear gas on demonstrators on University of California, Berkeley campus. May 20, 1969. Lonnie Wilson, photographer. Gelatin silver print. Collection of the Oakland Museum of California. The Oakland Tribune Collection. Gift of ANG Newspapers.
http://picturethis.museumca.org/pictures/helicopter-sprays-tear-gas-demonstrators-university-california-berkeley-campus

But Reagan stuck to his right-wing principles. He ordered police and troops to remain in Berkeley for the next two weeks. He did NOT like student activism, nor did most people who voted for him. California was still a somewhat conservative “red” state in the 1960s and people were frightened of the social changes happening before their eyes. (Doesn’t that sound familiar to our ears in 2019?) He proclaimed that the Berkeley campus had become "a haven for communist sympathizers, protesters, and sex deviants." Reagan went on statewide television, pissed, and vowing to put these students in their place. “What is there to negotiate?” he shouted, as if he couldn’t believe the students would even dare such action. Reagan also said:

"If it takes a bloodbath, let's get it over with. No more appeasement."

And…

"Once the dogs of war have been unleashed, you must expect things will happen, and that people, being human, will make mistakes on both sides."

Do the words of Ronald Reagan of 1969 sound familiar? And no, I’m not talking “tear down that wall.”

This whole thing, as I am looking back 50 years, all seems pretty similar to the situation we find ourselves in on this eve of that one small step for man.

First, President Trump told four female congresswomen of color to “go back” to the “totally broken and crime infested places from which they came,” though all four are U.S. citizens and only one was born outside the United States. 
Then, as Trump railed against Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), a naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Somalia, at a rally in Greenville, N.C., on Wednesday night, the crowd broke into a hostile chant: “Send her back!"
 Back to Africa.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2019/07/20/send-her-back-trump-ilhan-omar-complicated-history-back-africa/?utm_term=.038518c93597

And this happened yesterday in Atlanta.



And before people come at me saying “hoax”, take a look at this. The guy ADMITS it on the leading TV news station in the city. The lady confronting him is a Georgia State Representative. That's right, an elected official.



Is America a nation that has learned its lesson 50 years after Martin Luther King, Jr? 50 years after People’s Park? (By the way, the University and the community are STILL fighting over that patch of land TO THIS DAY. https://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/summer-2019/50-peoples-park-abides-how-much-longer)

50 years after the promise and the hope for all mankind that was Apollo 11?

For one brief, shining moment, the world was one, celebrating the achievement humanity made. That moment was all too fleeting. And in the era of The Donald, it seems as though we need to be taught the lessons of People’s Park, and of the Chicago Seven, and of Bobby Seale and the Black Panthers, all over again.



Getting deep into Pinterest

I am discovering the world of Pinterest.

I have been using Pinterest sporadically for the last couple of years, and have not paid too much attention to it. In the last few weeks, I have stepped up my Pinterest game significantly, and have been having a lot of fun with it. I created something like five or six new boards.

Take a look at some of my boards.

SXSW: Everything related to the festival in Austin.

College football: My favorite sport.

Money-saving groceries

Hotels and motels

My Tucson board

Health and wellness for guys

Romance novels, sci-fi and other books

Mustangs and other cars I like

1970s Toys: this also includes some 1970s food and cars

What are some of your boards on Pinterest? What are some of your favorite boards?

Thoughts on America, racism, equality and acceptance

This is a repost of a couple of questions answered on Quora.

At least here in the United States, we are only 150 years removed from when people of color were enslaved and made victims of outright genocide by Whites.

The United States was built on a race-based caste system with people of African descent at rock bottom (and it is often argued that indigenous tribal people were treated in the same manner if not more poorly). African people were abducted in Africa, rounded up, sold to slave traders (often if not predominantly as a result of tribal warfare), transported to the USA by slave ships, enslaved and legally regarded as property. White Americans were taught and conditioned to regard themselves as superior, and to regard Africans as less than human, almost as animals, in large part to justify their enslavement.

After slavery was ended (the outcome of a very bloody and violent civil war), people of color were still treated virtually in much the same or a similar manner as they were during slavery. When indigenous people weren’t being massacred, they were forced at gunpoint to live on reservations. Every effort was made to keep white supremacy the law of the land. Domestic terrorism, intended to force submission to this by people of color through intimidation, was virtually an official policy at the local and state level in the South (and many other areas nationwide as the 19th century gave way to the 20th). 19th-century academic scholars wrote books justifying white supremacy, and they basically argued that most non-White people were little evolved from animals. The “purity” of the “white race” was to be preserved, at the point of a gun if necessary.

(This was ironically at the same time some White men chose to have sexual relations with non-Whites, especially Black African-descended slaves, many times non-consensual, and many if not most times resulting in mixed-race offspring, who, many if not most times, were automatically and legally regarded in the same category as the slaves. Those few mixed-race people who phenotypically most closely resembled White people were sometimes able to conceal their African heritage and assimilate secretly into White society, a phenomenon known as “passing”, as in passing for, or pretending to be, a White person; for all intents and purposes they rejected their Black identity to escape the prevailing racially-based mistreatment, which, again, involved acts of terror, intimidation and violence approaching genocide. For this reason some White Americans actually possess some African DNA unknowingly (unless they discover it through DNA testing), and from a relatively recent ancestor. In some cases this heritage IS known but not openly discussed.)

The Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s (and resistance actions going back further than that) was the catalyst for white supremacy, as an official or semi-official doctrine of this nation, to be seriously confronted and challenged at the very least. Such confrontation, in turn, was resisted, many times violently and with tragic results.

In the USA, laws against interracial marriage were declared unconstitutional and unenforceable in 1967 as the result of a ruling of the Supreme Court. This was only over 50 years ago - still a terribly short time frame when looked at over the entire history of this nation.*

It has only been within the last 100 years that meaningful federal legislation was enacted securing legal civil rights for non-Whites and that legislation has not been, and is sometimes still not, taken seriously by some.

In the present situation, the non-White population of the United States has grown to the point where the White population has become, in many regions, a numerical minority. This demographic situation will continue. Non-Whites are also making slight gains in economic and political power (significant gains in certain contexts). This situation frightens and angers some White people who still cling to the ideas of white supremacy and who still reject the notion that non-Whites are their equals.

The ideas of racism and bigotry are difficult to eradicate in this society. Many White people - certainly not all, but far too many - regard ethnic and racial minorities as a constant threat to their dominance and survival. When a White person chooses a non-White person as a relationship partner, they seem to see this as an affront to their supremacy. Some parents, to this day, even in 2019, will disown children if they “marry outside their race.” They desperately cling to a notion that should have died 100 years ago. This desperation is (in my opinion) one of the major factors in the election of Donald Trump to the presidency.

These people stubbornly and wrongly refuse to accept non-White people as equal members of society and persist in treating them as the “enemy” in every possible aspect. And some of these people are crazy enough to act on this perceived state of “race war”, sometimes with tragic results.

This situation places a great strain on the democratic republic we live under here in the USA. It’s my hope that more rational ideas will win out over time and controversy over interracial relationships, and even over minorities becoming financially and economically successful, will fade. But when a nation is all but founded on “white supremacy” and there is continued misguided resistance to principled challenges against it (some of it violent), that’s a huge uphill battle.

*Interracial marriage was illegal in several states of the USA until 1967, when laws prohibiting such marriages were declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia

Relatively few White men were in open, known relationships with Black women.

If a Black woman did have children with a White man in those days (especially in the states of the old Confederacy), (or vice versa, which was even more rare) in most situations, the identity of the father was mostly kept quiet (the relationship may or may not even have been consensual) and the children were identified as Black, and generally absorbed/assimilated fully inside the Black community and subject to the same discrimination and mistreatment common to that era (partly as a result, the average African-American is about 25% White by DNA analysis).

There is a story of a Black woman (Essie Mae Washington-Williams) who was the illegitimate daughter of a White man, future U.S. Senator, who lived most of her entire life as a Black woman, inside the Black community, with little knowledge of her father, a distant relationship with him at best, and only nominal privilege afforded to her as a result of that status. Others like this mixed-race woman had even fewer opportunities.

  A Call to Action: Defending Democracy Against Authoritarian Overreach The Trump administration’s relentless assault on American democracy...